[WT-support] RDA Contest - Bug in ADIF?

[Lothar Sack]

Thanks for the answers. Now I understand why the fields "STATE" and 
"CNTY" have sense.
I have no problem editing the fields in my ADIF-File.
I try to convince the people of "HAM Office" to support the original 
ADIF. In the meantime my workaround
is using the field "CNTY" that contains the RDA in the wanted format!
Tnx again, 73
Lothar, DJ8EW

Am 22.08.2012 12:47, schrieb Lothar Sack:
> I worked RDA Contest with Win-Test 4.10.0-dev
> Creating ADIF for my logbook-program I got this result:
> A RDA, e.g.  "ST34" created the adif 3 (!) parts:
> <SRX:4>ST34 /that is like expected, but additional these two parts/:
> *<STATE:2>ST
> <CNTY:5>ST-34*
> The last two parts are not correct and created confusion to the 
> statistic of my logbook (hamoffice).
> Does anyone have this problem too?
> 73, Lothar, DJ8EW

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.f5mzn.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20120823/3fb3e59b/attachment.html>