[WT-support] microHam micro2R with WT

Matthias Jelen Matthias.Jelen at gmx.de
Thu May 13 23:52:02 CEST 2010


Hello!

I also encounter this delay problem from time to time with my MK2R+, but never found a way to reproduce it. But I can solve it almost always by

- making all correct settings in the Microham router
- storing them as power up setting
- shutting down WT, router and the MK2R
- starting the MK2R+, the router and WT again.

I guess it is somehow related to the control of the MK2R+ via the virtual port, because sometimes changing the port for the control solved / triggered the problem.

I once thought increasing the baud rate of the WinKey an control ports helped for me, but I was told that this shouldn´t have any influence. But maybee this is also worth a try...

73s,

Matthias, DK4YJ


-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 13 May 2010 15:05:17 +0200
> Von: "Luc Favre" <luc-favre at orange.fr>
> An: support at win-test.com
> Betreff: Re: [WT-support] microHam micro2R with WT

> My 2 pence comment :
> My MK2R have the same behaviour, very often, but sometime not. I don't
> know 
> what I did the days it hasn't !
> I will follow this thread with high attention !
> 73
> Luc/F6HJO/HB9ABB
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <sm5ajv at qrq.se>
> To: <support at win-test.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 2:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [WT-support] microHam micro2R with WT
> 
> 
> >
> > I've tested as suggested, still same delay.
> >
> > I think there is two "evidence" that maybe WinTest is doing
> > something wrong.
> >
> > 1. You said this is common problem with MK2R/MK2R+ AND WinTest.
> > 2. It looks like it is working OK with N1MM.
> > 3. WinTest is dropping the PTT-line when sending canned messages.
> >
> > I will post my logging to microHam as well to see what they
> > have to say.
> >
> > 73
> > Ingo SM5AJV / SE5E
> >
> >
> >> Thanks for posting the communications log.  It's possible the new
> micro2R 
> >> is
> >> not completely compatible the the MK2R/MK2R+, and changes are required
> in
> >> Win-Test, but I would start by asking microHAM support for assistance.
> >>
> >> Did you try experimenting with the HANDSHAKE settings on the microHAM
> >> control port?  Try Always OFF, Always ON, or Handshake to see if that 
> >> makes
> >> any difference.
> >>
> >> If that doesn't work, try the same with the WinKey port.  The software 
> >> seems
> >> to be waiting for something, hence the delays.
> >>
> >> 73,
> >> Bob, N6TV
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:53 AM, <sm5ajv at qrq.se> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for your advices.
> >>>
> >>> FIRST
> >>> N6TV wrote:
> >>> > 1-2 second delays are a common problem when using Win-Test with the
> >>> microHAM
> >>> > control protocol, even with the older MK2R+
> >>>
> >>> If this is a known issue, I would really like it to be solved.
> >>> Having this delay makes SO2R almost useless. I didn't see any bug
> report 
> >>> of
> >>> this. So please SW-guys. Look into this!
> >>>
> >>> MY FINDINGS
> >>> I didn't get it working properly and I still have a delay of 1 seconds
> >>> before the CW goes out. It looks like the CW part is going out when
> >>> the RX focus is changing. The RX Focus is changing 1 seconds
> >>> after TX focus is changed. I don't see any reason of this delay.
> >>> See the dumps below.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> micro2R:
> >>> 0014128234:  H-TX: FT1   (set TX focus to R1)
> >>> 0014129312:  H-TX: FR1   (set RX focus to R1) <-- 1.078 ms late
> >>> 0014129312:  H-TX: FR2   (set RX focus to R2)
> >>> 0014131468:  H-TX: FR1   (set RX focus to R1)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> WinKey:
> >>> 0014129312:  H-TX: 53     S  <-- CW STARTS at the same time as FR1 is 
> >>> sent,
> >>> see above
> >>> 0014129328:  H-RX: C4      [status: WAIT=0, KEYDOWN=0, BUSY=1, 
> >>> BREAKIN=0,
> >>> XOFF=0]
> >>> 0014129546:  H-RX: 53     S
> >>> 0014129546:  H-TX: 45     E  <-- Messge is sent from WT character by
> >>> character
> >>> 0014129687:  H-RX: 45     E
> >>> 0014129687:  H-TX: 35     5
> >>> 0014130109:  H-RX: 35     5
> >>> 0014130109:  H-TX: 45     E
> >>> 0014130250:  H-RX: 45     E
> >>> 0014130250:  H-TX: 20
> >>> 0014130453:  H-RX: 20
> >>> 0014130453:  H-TX: 54     T
> >>> 0014130468:  H-RX: C0      [status: WAIT=0, KEYDOWN=0, BUSY=0, 
> >>> BREAKIN=0,
> >>> XOFF=0]
> >>> 0014130484:  H-RX: C4      [status: WAIT=0, KEYDOWN=0, BUSY=1, 
> >>> BREAKIN=0,
> >>> XOFF=0]
> >>> 0014130625:  H-RX: 54     T
> >>> 0014130640:  H-TX: 45     E
> >>> 0014130765:  H-RX: 45     E
> >>> 0014130765:  H-TX: 53     S
> >>> 0014131046:  H-RX: 53     S
> >>> 0014131046:  H-TX: 54     T
> >>> 0014131250:  H-RX: 54     T
> >>> 0014131250:  H-TX: 20
> >>> 0014131468:  H-RX: 20
> >>> 0014131484:  H-TX: (postponed) 1E      [Cancel Buffered Speed Change]
> >>> 0014131484:  H-RX: C0      [status: WAIT=0, KEYDOWN=0, BUSY=0, 
> >>> BREAKIN=0,
> >>> XOFF=0]
> >>> 0014131500:  H-TX: postponed data sent
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> COMPARISION WITH N1MM
> >>> I have compared this behaviour with N1MM. In N1MM there is no delay
> >>> before the CW gose out. So I think there is something wrong with WT.
> >>>
> >>> PTT HANDLING WITH WINKEY
> >>> Another difference, which I have pointed out earlier when dealing
> >>> with a WinKey USB, is that WinTest sends character by character
> >>> to the WinKey chip. You can see this in the WK dump below.
> >>> N1MM sends a chunk of characters. This may be related to the problem
> >>> that the PTT-line drops between words if you don't put in a very long
> >>> PTT Tail. I think it's better to make the WK:
> >>>
> >>> [PTT ON], [send all characters in the message] [PTT OFF]
> >>>
> >>> PTT delay should only be applied to the PTT ON in the beginning and
> >>> PTT TAIL should only be applied to the PTT OFF at the end of the
> >>> transmission. This is for "canned" messages.
> >>> Normally you want to have PTT DELAY set to get all relays
> >>> change over before you start sending. The PTT TAIL DELAY
> >>> should be rather small for canned messages. Or only used when
> >>> you use the PADDLE
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 73
> >>> Ingo SM5AJV / SE5E
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > 1-2 second delays are a common problem when using Win-Test with the
> >>> microHAM
> >>> > control protocol, even with the older MK2R+.
> >>> >
> >>> > Make sure you don't have PTT lead/tail delays set to the default 
> >>> > values.
> >>> > Use the *minimum* numbers (e.g. 0.0 if possible).  You have to set 
> >>> > this
> >>> in
> >>> > both the Router program and in the Win-Test Winkey Configuration 
> >>> > screen
> >>> > (shortcut:  WKSETUP [Enter]).
> >>> >
> >>> > Sometimes powering everything off and on in just the right sequence 
> >>> > will
> >>> > correct the problem, e.g.:
> >>> >
> >>> >    1. Power on computer
> >>> >    2. Wait for Router program to start (yellow X)
> >>> >    3. Power on microHAM box
> >>> >    4. Wait for Router to detect microHAM (Green check mark)
> >>> >    5. Turn on radios
> >>> >    6. Wait for microHAM Ports tab to display rig freq.
> >>> >    7. Start Win-Test
> >>> >    8. Issue two or three messages to see if thing speed up (first
> few
> >>> >    messages may be delayed)
> >>> >
> >>> > If that doesn't help, verify that you are using the correct COM port
> >>> > settings in Win-Test Interface Configuration, e.g.:
> >>> >
> >>> >    - microHAM control port:  38400,N,8,1
> >>> >    - WinKey port:  1200,N,8,2 Handshake/Handshake
> >>> >    - Elecraft port:  4800,N,8,1 Always OFF/Always OFF
> >>> >    - Yaesu port:  4800,N,8,2 Always OFF/Always OFF
> >>> >
> >>> > For radios, press the "Use xxx defaults" button on the Win-Test COM 
> >>> > port
> >>> > setup screen.  Make sure both Win-Test and the microHAM box are 
> >>> > talking
> >>> to
> >>> > the rig with the same speed settings.
> >>> >
> >>> > 73,
> >>> > Bob, N6TV
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 1:58 AM, <sm5ajv at qrq.se> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> I am trying to get the new microHam micro2R (SO2R) box to work with
> >>> >> WT
> >>> >> and have run into some problems.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> When starting CQ by pushing F1 in WT it takes about 1 second
> >>> >> before the actual CW output is started. Has anyone any hint
> >>> >> on how to configure this new device with WT. I am using
> >>> >> the MK2R setup for the Control Port.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Pushing the test command for F1 on the router starts CW
> immediately.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Any advices are most welcome!
> >>> >>
> >>> >> 73
> >>> >> Ingo SM5AJV / SE5E
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> Support mailing list
> >>> >> Support at win-test.com
> >>> >> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> >>> >>
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > Support mailing list
> >>> > Support at win-test.com
> >>> > http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Support mailing list
> >>> Support at win-test.com
> >>> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Support mailing list
> >> Support at win-test.com
> >> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Support mailing list
> > Support at win-test.com
> > http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Antivirus avast! : message Entrant sain.
> > Base de donnees virale (VPS) : 100513-0, 13/05/2010
> > Analyse le : 13/05/2010 14:13:45
> > avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 ALWIL Software.
> > http://www.avast.com
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> Antivirus avast! : message Sortant sain.
> Base de donnees virale (VPS) : 100513-0, 13/05/2010
> Analyse le : 13/05/2010 15:05:17
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 ALWIL Software.
> http://www.avast.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at win-test.com
> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

-- 
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01


More information about the Support mailing list