[WT-support] Spot/band map enhancements

[Andy Hewitt]

As a user of WinTest ver 3.22, could someone please enlighten me? What is
ESM in this context? 
73 and Thanks
Andy G3SVD

-----Original Message-----
From: support-bounces at win-test.com [mailto:support-bounces at win-test.com] On
Behalf Of Clive Whelan
Sent: 20 September 2009 10:38
To: support at win-test.com
Subject: Re: [WT-support] Spot/band map enhancements

Bob

You're right of course, but remember that v4 was announced with ESM ( 
finally) included, and is why I am here, as I wouldn't get out of bed 
without it!

I doubt that $SPACEBAR can help as this can only be placed ( afaik) in 
an F key macro, but I am open to correction of course. Equally I can't 
see that editing esm.ets could help as it would need to know that the 
call has been grabbed from the bandmap and I guess that this requires an 
additional API call?. Again I am no programmer.btw I only use the 
bandmap and " spots" from my own trawling.

I imagine that the base programme could address this. This would require 
finite human resources of course which I understand are scarce, but 
since the r'aison d'etre of V4 from my p.o.v. is ESM I believe it should 
be addressed to make WT a serious player in the field.

73


Clive
GW3NJW

Bob Wilson, N6TV wrote:
> Please note that ESM mode is very new to Win-Test, therefore most 
> readers of this reflector are not using ESM yet.  If you are using 
> ESM, and the position of the cursor is important (I thought it was 
> ignored by default), then perhaps you /would/ want the cursor to 
> remain in the callsign field after clicking on a spot.
>
> But if you're not using ESM mode (e.g. NOESM), then you don't want the 
> cursor to be there after clicking on a spot.
>
> Perhaps on CW, with creative use of the $SPACEBAR macro, you can get 
> the same behavior.
>
> 73,
> Bob, N6TV
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Clive Whelan 
> <clive.whelan at btinternet.com <mailto:clive.whelan at btinternet.com>> wrote:
>
>     Of course it doesn't, the opposite is true!
>
>     If it's in the exchange field I have to shift to the callsign field to
>     call in ESM otherwise garbage is sent. If WT is to be taken seriously
>     for ESM this problem needs to be addressed imo. The other
>     behaviour is a
>     throw back to CT protocol
>
>     73
>
>
>     Clive
>     GW3NJW
>
>     Bob Wilson, N6TV wrote:
>     > Why would you want the cursor in the callsign field if it is already
>     > correctly entered from the spot data?  That forces an extra
>     keystroke
>     > every time.
>     >
>     > 73,
>     > Bob, N6TV
>     >
>     > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Clive Whelan
>     > <clive.whelan at btinternet.com
>     <mailto:clive.whelan at btinternet.com>
>     <mailto:clive.whelan at btinternet.com
>     <mailto:clive.whelan at btinternet.com>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Unless there is a way to accomplish this that I've missed, I
>     >     suggest...
>     >
>     >
>     >     When clicking on a spot the cursor should be in the callsign
>     field and
>     >     NOT the report field, or more preferably non dupe spots should
>     >     automatically be brought into the log pane ready to call
>     with ( as
>     >     before) the cursor in the callsign field.
>     >
>     >     73
>     >
>     >
>     >     Clive
>     >     GW3NJW
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at win-test.com
> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>   
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
Support at win-test.com
http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support