[WT-support] WT and Winkey
G3SJJ
g3sjj at btinternet.com
Fri Feb 9 17:27:57 CET 2007
Hello Rudy, I apologise if my comments came across as abrasive. Yes, the
development team are doing a great job and there are many aspects of WT
which I really like. My comments were more aimed at needing at least an
acknowledgment than actual implementation. It is difficult to know if a
bug raised has been added to the list and allocated a number. I guess I
got used to the N1MM system! Simon M0CLW, who I know, commented that the
fact I saw my own posting indicates it is being looked at. That isn't a
very professional approach!
I have raised a number of problems with WT / WinKey / mHam Router
interface and I am pleased that these are being addressed as I wasn't
sure. I have asked for two other points to be added to the list. I will
need to add another one which I have now find twice on the latest
version. I guess whilst ever I am experiencing these problems I am not
able to move on and learn about the other good facilities.
Regarding speeding up/down, yes I agree it is a personal choice, which
is why I would prefer to see it not as default. Enough on that one!!
In conclusion just to say that I operated in the FOC Marathon last
weekend and despite the poor HF conditions (why only at a weekend?!)
made 824 Qs over 6 bands. Apart from the interface problems I have
raised WT performed excellently with rapid moves around, sometimes 6
bands in less than two minutes. It was a pleasure to use. The GUI is
also very good in that respect. That makes about 1700 contest Qs so far
this year.
Vy 73 Chris G3SJJ
Rudolf Schwenger wrote:
> Chris,
>
> sorry, but the last para of your mail raises my blood pressure a bit.
> In my mind and from my two years experience with the WinTest
> development team these guys are second to none when it comes to
> service, speed of reply and precise action in case of bugs. The speed
> with which they turn out new releases is unparalleld.
>
> Whenever I had questions or reported a bug I got an answer the same
> day or over night. Fantastic!
>
> Admittedly I didn't follow your correspondence with the development
> team too closely although the problems addressed by you - embedding
> the microKEYER/WINKEYER in WT - have also been and still are my
> problems. However, I guess it doesn't really help the guys to mention
> basically the same issues time and again. To give you an example: I
> think I have read at least three or four times in your messages that
> you consider the speed step in transmitting the 599 as poor
> cw-practice and you would prefer not to have this feature as a
> default. If that's your considered opinion: Fine. I don't share it.
> The 599/5nn is garbage, an absolutely useless piece of information.
> But required by the rules of most contests. So why not apply common
> sense and deal with it as a piece of garbage? And it is so easy to
> take the speed up/speed down out of the F-Key messages! Is it really
> worth mentioning this topic at all?
>
> What I wanted to say is that in my oppinion the guys are doing a
> fantastic job for all of us and we should avoid everything which tends
> to distract their attention from or their enthusiasm of continuing to
> develop an even better tool for all of us.
>
> vy 73 de Rudy, DJ3WE
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "G3SJJ" <g3sjj at btinternet.com>
> To: <support at win-test.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 9:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [WT-support] WT and Winkey
>
>
>> Thanks Kenth.
>>
>> Your suggestion number 1 appears to have stabilised it for now. There
>> is still a difference between speeds when I transfer from Logger32 to
>> Wintest. 30wpm in Logger translates to 44wpm in Wintest. Well out
>> the range for most contests. I have also found that if I leave a
>> small delay between sending on the paddle and hitting an F Key, the
>> problem of F Key not transmitting is avoided. Obviously a question of
>> a timing issue in WT that I have not found before in K8CC's NA,
>> Writelog or N1MM.
>>
>> I always take out the + and - in the message. These should not be
>> default as they are unnecessary for 99.999% of contest operating and
>> are poor operating anyway.
>>
>> Transmitting of the character ' is still present when using Alt
>> F9/F10 to make an increase in speed.
>>
>> Not sure if the development team have seen my recent posting as yet
>> again there has been no acknowledgment! What happened to good old
>> courtesy, eh?
>>
>> Chris G3SJJ
>>
>>
>>
>> Kenth Johansson wrote:
>>> Chris,
>>> I don´t think I have the full soloution for the winkey problems
>>> together with the microkeyer but I have changed the following in my
>>> setup:
>>>
>>> 1. Options > Interfaces coniguration >Winkey > Configure. The
>>> default value for DTR, RTS pins are -Handshake-. I have changed to
>>> -Always on-.
>>>
>>> 2. F-messages. I don´t use + - values to change speed in a message.
>>>
>>> Theese changes have helped me.
>>>
>>> Kenth
>>> sm6dyk
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "G3SJJ" <g3sjj at btinternet.com>
>>> To: <support at win-test.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 5:37 PM
>>> Subject: [WT-support] WT and Winkey
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is there any progress on making WT work correctly with Winkey yet?
>>>>
>>>> I was operating in the FOC Marathon last weeeknd and had really bad
>>>> problems. It is still very unstable. At one stage I had closed the
>>>> computer down during a rest period. On rebooting at 0600, it took
>>>> me 30 minutes to get to a stable situation, consequently I missed
>>>> some importna pre-sunrise DX QSOs. At first, keying from the
>>>> paddles connected to mHam Keyer was normal, but when I pressed an F
>>>> key, CW was sent to the PC loudspeaker instead of keying the radio,
>>>> re-booting and reopening WT produced the same situation. Eventually
>>>> I got to stage when WT was keying the radio correctly, but the
>>>> speed variation between internal CW and via mH Keyer was again
>>>> apparent. It is not good operating practice to transmit the
>>>> character ' when changing speed up or down using Alt F9/10. Also
>>>> at times to would just send the first character of the F key
>>>> message. eg F instead of FOC G3SJJ G3SJJ FOC.
>>>>
>>>> I am now setting up for RSGB 1.8MHz Contest, and again the '
>>>> character is transmitted at Alt F9/10. In independent speed both
>>>> speeds are currently set to 30wpm. The computer speed is correct
>>>> whilst paddle sent speed is much slower. Adjusting the speed knob
>>>> so that the speeds are the same shows 30 and 34.
>>>>
>>>> Earlier in this test session if I sent on the paddle and then hit
>>>> an F Key nothing happened, as I reported after CQWW. Now, if I send
>>>> a paddle message then hit an F key the first character is dropped.
>>>> EG (Paddle) Pete (Computer) NN instead of 5NN, or Est instead
>>>> of Test. This only appears to happen when there is nothing in the
>>>> callsign field.
>>>>
>>>> I am now at the stage when using WT is more of a liability than an
>>>> asset and each time I run the program I ask myself what new
>>>> features I will find!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 73 Chris G3SJJ
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Support mailing list
>>>> Support at win-test.com
>>>> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Jag använder en gratisversion av SPAMfighter för privata användare.
>>> 959 spam har blivit blockerade hittills.
>>> Betalande användare har inte detta meddelande i sin e-post.
>>> Hämta gratis SPAMfighter idag!
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Support mailing list
>>> Support at win-test.com
>>> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Support mailing list
>> Support at win-test.com
>> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at win-test.com
> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>
More information about the Support
mailing list