[wt4hq] synchronisation speed

Oliver Huber oe5oho at hotmail.com
Fri Jul 8 22:18:14 CEST 2011



We made a short test switching back to 4.5.2 HQ versions only in the WAN/LAN...
Same results. About 15min for synchronisation...

Then we went back to 4.8.0 version... Now it works okay (meaning all logs are synchronised in 2-3 minutes)...

I don't know what's going on here :-(
Wired...

Anyhow - I guess we will use 4.8.0 during the contest.

73 Oliver

PS: suggestions are still welcome


  ... One of the ACC and BCC ...
======================
Visit: http://www.qsl.net/oe5oho

Email: oe5oho at gmx.at

oe5oho at hotmail.com
Packet: oe5oho at oe5xbr.aut.eu



From: oe5oho at hotmail.com
To: wt4hq at f5mzn.org
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 18:57:28 +0000
Subject: [wt4hq] synchronisation speed









Hi all.

Yesterday we made a test session with our setup (server=Linux 2.4.1, clients either 4.8.0 full or HQ version) and observed heavy time delay with synchronisation - and quite some timeouts despite having decent internetconnections at the different QTHs.
We entered just a bit more than 100 QSO on our individual logs...
It took good 15 minutes (or more?) until all logs have been in sync - we had a maximum of 6 stations at that time connected to the server (no additional PCs in the LANs, just bridgehead stations).

Last years setup with the same(!) server version, but obviously 4.5.x full or HQ versions, was working like a charme for 85% of the contest.

Anyone else having troubles???
Any tips or ideas what could have been the problem? Any server side tweaks?

As long as we have only 2 or 3 stations connected QSOs are synchronised at an amazing speed.

73 and cu in the contest
OE1A team


  ... One of the ACC and BCC ...
======================
Visit: http://www.qsl.net/oe5oho

Email: oe5oho at gmx.at

oe5oho at hotmail.com
Packet: oe5oho at oe5xbr.aut.eu

 		 	   		  

_______________________________________________
Wt4hq mailing list
Wt4hq at f5mzn.org
http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wt4hq 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.f5mzn.org/pipermail/wt4hq/attachments/20110708/4691fbe4/attachment.html>


More information about the Wt4hq mailing list