[wt4hq] Bridgehead-Bug / LogSync
Laurent HAAS - F6FVY
f6fvy at free.fr
Thu Jul 9 22:55:12 CEST 2009
Hi again
Mario Lorenz a écrit :
> Unexpectedly however I saw the ADDQSO traffic on the tunnel server:
> ADDQSO: "E15SSB2" "C40SSB" "X10SSB_1" 1247162569 142276 1 5 0 0 4 1 25 "4L1FP"
> "59" "59" "" "" "" 0 "" "" "" 59002
>
> (E115SSB and C40SSB are in the same LAN, C40SSB was turned on fresh)
>
> I do not remember seing this last year, so I dont know if this behaviour
> has changed. Shouldnt the tunnel client
> know - similar to the server - which station is local and which is
> on the WAN, and hence not forward this kind of traffic ?
There is no filtering on ADDQSO: in wtTunnel
Filtering is applied only on IHAVE: (described in my previous message)
and NEEDQSO: (only those with external destination are forwarded to the
WAN).
As far as I remember (and our CVS does confirm it), it always worked
like this. Actually, the ADDQSO: _must_ be forwarded, as it is the same
frame that is used when you manually enter a QSO. Maybe we could
consider a different set of frame IDs for sync, and filter it
appropriately in wtTunnel... (Just an idea - No deep analysis of the
consequences on the current WT code yet ;-) ).
73
Larry - F6FVY
More information about the Wt4hq
mailing list