[WT-support] Wrong Frequency/Band in Cabrillo

Bjorn LB1GB lb1gb at la8w.com
Sat Oct 8 09:41:12 CEST 2011


Hi,

I use CapsLock + Alt-F1/F2 to change band.
No OmniRig.

Bjorn LB1GB

On 5 October 2011 08:50, Bob Wilson, N6TV <n6tv at arrl.net> wrote:
> Both logs seems to have something in common:
> Rig 1 on Band A (RUN)
> Rig 2 on Band B (S&P)
> All is OK until Rig 2 is moved to Band C.  The very first QSO that Rig 2
> makes on Band C logs the band correctly (C) but the frequency incorrectly
> (it instead logs the frequency from the very last QSO that Rig 2 made on
> band B).
> Was this the first QSO that SE5E made on 20m with Rig 2?
> The question now is, how are you guys moving the secondary radio to the 3rd
> band?
>
> Right click on Announcements Window and "Pass frequency to secondary radio"?
> By using the band switch on the radio?
> Via CapsLock + Alt-F1/Alt-F2?

> Via CapsLock + type in new band in meters (20 Enter)?
> Via CapsLock + type in new frequency in kHz (14020 Enter)?
> By right clicking on a spot in the Announcements window?
> By clicking on an SDR waterfall display (e.g. HDSDR + OmniRig Sync)?
> Using a MEMORY in the Radio (M->V)?
> Some other method?
>
> Are you using OmniRig?  Are you both using StackCalls (which simulates
> pressing Alt-1, which caused the problem reported in Task #259).
> 73,
> Bob, N6TV
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:18 PM, SM5AJV <sm5ajv at qrq.se> wrote:
>>
>> It's impossible to remember any key sequences but I will
>> try to resume the "facts" below.
>>
>> I think it may have something to do with the updating of
>> the frequency from the secondary radio.
>>
>> And there should never be any difference between what seen
>> on the log screen and what's in the database...
>>
>> I can provide the log-file if its of any use.
>>
>>
>> Some facts:
>>
>> * WT version 4.8.0
>> * RADIO1 FT1000MP
>> * RADIO2 TS-480
>> * SO2R with Secondary Radio Window
>> * RUN station on 15 meters (FT1000MP)
>> * RADIO2 on 20 meters (TS480)
>> * Last QSO (#221) on 28 MHz before the faulty one was on 28010 with RADIO2
>>  See Cabrillo below.
>> * The faulty (#236) QSO  was shown as 20 meters on the log screen
>>  but 28010 in the actual log (ALT-F and Cabrillo)
>> * The actual frequency of the faulty QSO was 14037
>> * All QSO's between #221 and #236 was on 15 meters.
>>
>> Here is a snippet from the Cabrillo:
>>
>> QSO: 28010 CW 2011-09-17 1424 SE5E  599 0221   SP9DUX   599 062
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1425 SE5E  599 0222   R9QQ     599 011
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1426 SE5E  599 0223   K4MTI    599 016
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1427 SE5E  599 0224   DL5YM    599 010
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1427 SE5E  599 0225   UA1ZZ    599 034
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1428 SE5E  599 0226   KA2ETG   599 001
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1428 SE5E  599 0227   AC5K     599 031
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1428 SE5E  599 0228   YO9WF    599 012
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1429 SE5E  599 0229   OK2MBP   599 063
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1430 SE5E  599 0230   W3IUU    599 007
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1431 SE5E  599 0231   K3DQB    599 013
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1431 SE5E  599 0232   W2LE     599 079
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1431 SE5E  599 0233   EK6LP    599 019
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1432 SE5E  599 0234   N8II     599 085
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1433 SE5E  599 0235   K2LP     599 021
>> QSO: 28010 CW 2011-09-17 1434 SE5E  599 0236   SV1ENG   599 084 <--
>> actually on 14037
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1435 SE5E  599 0237   LZ2FM    599 097
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1435 SE5E  599 0238   AA3B     599 058
>>
>>
>> 73
>> Ingo SM5AJV
>>
>>
>> > A similar problem was reported and fixed two years ago.  See Task
>> > #259<http://flyspray.win-test.com/index.php?do=details&id=259>.
>> >  Where you using WT 4.8 or 4.9-dev?
>> >
>> > Please try to come up with an exact sequence of steps to easily
>> > reproduce
>> > the problem (as ES5TV did two years ago).  The sooner you can do that,
>> > the
>> > sooner the problem can be fixed.  I can't really open a bug report
>> > without
>> > more details about how to reproduce it.
>> >
>> > Did you use the Partner window at all?  Did you press Alt-1?  (Not
>> > Alt-F1).
>> >  Were you using SO2R and the secondary radio window?  Did you ever press
>> > Alt-F1 or Alt-F2 to change bands of a previously-logged QSO?  Or to
>> > change
>> > bands at all?  Were you using OmniRig?  What radio models were selected?
>> >
>> > 73,
>> > Bob, N6TV
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Bjorn LB1GB <lb1gb at la8w.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I was puzzled by losing a multiplier in SAC, but thought I made a
>> >> mistake. After your post I investigated a bit and found RA9AP that I
>> >> worked on 10 meters shows 21009.5 when doing Alt-F. Thus losing the
>> >> mulitipier.
>> >>
>> >> wt4 file shows 10M, cabrillo shows 21009.5.
>> >>
>> >> The ADI file is correct and the QSO was confirmed as a 10M qso on LOTW.
>> >>
>> >> Bjorn LB1GB
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 4 October 2011 22:01, SM5AJV <sm5ajv at qrq.se> wrote:
>> >> > Hi!
>> >> >
>> >> > I am checking my log from SAC CW and I found one serious fault.
>> >> >
>> >> > The log line in WinTest (screen) says:
>> >> > QSO  Bd Time  Callsign
>> >> > 275  20 14:35 SV1ENG
>> >> >
>> >> > But I if push Alt-F to check the details it says that we
>> >> > worked on 28 MHz! The resulting Cabrillo shows 28 MHz and
>> >> > not the correct 20 meters frequency.
>> >> >
>> >> > How on earth is it possible to have one band on the log and
>> >> > another in the actual log? The fault will result i WRONG BAND
>> >> > during the logcheck and zero points/mult :-(
>> >> >
>> >> > Used WT version 4.8.0
>> >> >
>> >> > 73
>> >> > Ingo SM5AJV / SE5E
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Support mailing list
>> >> > support at win-test.com
>> >> > http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Support mailing list
>> >> support at win-test.com
>> >> http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Support mailing list
>> > support at win-test.com
>> > http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Support mailing list
>> support at win-test.com
>> http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> support at win-test.com
> http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>
>


More information about the Support mailing list