[WT-support] Wrong Frequency/Band in Cabrillo
SM5AJV
sm5ajv at qrq.se
Wed Oct 5 09:55:42 CEST 2011
Thanks for prompt reply Bob!
1. The first 20m QSO on Rig2 was with SV1ENG and it's
the one that was logged on the wrong band.
2. I am usually changing the band using the band
switch on the radio and I think this was the
case here. No band map clicking etc in this case.
3. I am not using OmniRig.
4. I am not using StackedCalls
73
Ingo SM5AJV / SE5E
> Both logs seems to have something in common:
>
> Rig 1 on Band A (RUN)
> Rig 2 on Band B (S&P)
>
> All is OK until Rig 2 is moved to Band C. The very *first* QSO that Rig 2
> makes on Band C logs the band correctly (C) but the *frequency* incorrectly
> (it instead logs the frequency from the very last QSO that Rig 2 made on
> band B).
>
> Was this the first QSO that SE5E made on 20m with Rig 2?
>
> The question now is, how are you guys moving the secondary radio to the 3rd
> band?
>
> 1. Right click on Announcements Window and "Pass frequency to secondary
> radio"?
> 2. By using the band switch on the radio?
> 3. Via CapsLock + Alt-F1/Alt-F2?
> 4. Via CapsLock + type in new band in meters (20 Enter)?
> 5. Via CapsLock + type in new frequency in kHz (14020 Enter)?
> 6. By right clicking on a spot in the Announcements window?
> 7. By clicking on an SDR waterfall display (e.g. HDSDR + OmniRig Sync)?
> 8. Using a MEMORY in the Radio (M->V)?
> 9. Some other method?
>
> Are you using OmniRig? Are you both using StackCalls (which simulates
> pressing Alt-1, which caused the problem reported in Task #259).
>
> 73,
> Bob, N6TV
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:18 PM, SM5AJV <sm5ajv at qrq.se> wrote:
>
>> It's impossible to remember any key sequences but I will
>> try to resume the "facts" below.
>>
>> I think it may have something to do with the updating of
>> the frequency from the secondary radio.
>>
>> And there should never be any difference between what seen
>> on the log screen and what's in the database...
>>
>> I can provide the log-file if its of any use.
>>
>>
>> Some facts:
>>
>> * WT version 4.8.0
>> * RADIO1 FT1000MP
>> * RADIO2 TS-480
>> * SO2R with Secondary Radio Window
>> * RUN station on 15 meters (FT1000MP)
>> * RADIO2 on 20 meters (TS480)
>> * Last QSO (#221) on 28 MHz before the faulty one was on 28010 with RADIO2
>> See Cabrillo below.
>> * The faulty (#236) QSO was shown as 20 meters on the log screen
>> but 28010 in the actual log (ALT-F and Cabrillo)
>> * The actual frequency of the faulty QSO was 14037
>> * All QSO's between #221 and #236 was on 15 meters.
>>
>> Here is a snippet from the Cabrillo:
>>
>> QSO: 28010 CW 2011-09-17 1424 SE5E 599 0221 SP9DUX 599 062
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1425 SE5E 599 0222 R9QQ 599 011
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1426 SE5E 599 0223 K4MTI 599 016
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1427 SE5E 599 0224 DL5YM 599 010
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1427 SE5E 599 0225 UA1ZZ 599 034
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1428 SE5E 599 0226 KA2ETG 599 001
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1428 SE5E 599 0227 AC5K 599 031
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1428 SE5E 599 0228 YO9WF 599 012
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1429 SE5E 599 0229 OK2MBP 599 063
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1430 SE5E 599 0230 W3IUU 599 007
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1431 SE5E 599 0231 K3DQB 599 013
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1431 SE5E 599 0232 W2LE 599 079
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1431 SE5E 599 0233 EK6LP 599 019
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1432 SE5E 599 0234 N8II 599 085
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1433 SE5E 599 0235 K2LP 599 021
>> QSO: 28010 CW 2011-09-17 1434 SE5E 599 0236 SV1ENG 599 084 <--
>> actually on 14037
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1435 SE5E 599 0237 LZ2FM 599 097
>> QSO: 21023 CW 2011-09-17 1435 SE5E 599 0238 AA3B 599 058
>>
>>
>> 73
>> Ingo SM5AJV
>>
>>
>> > A similar problem was reported and fixed two years ago. See Task
>> > #259<http://flyspray.win-test.com/index.php?do=details&id=259>.
>> > Where you using WT 4.8 or 4.9-dev?
>> >
>> > Please try to come up with an exact sequence of steps to easily reproduce
>> > the problem (as ES5TV did two years ago). The sooner you can do that,
>> the
>> > sooner the problem can be fixed. I can't really open a bug report
>> without
>> > more details about how to reproduce it.
>> >
>> > Did you use the Partner window at all? Did you press Alt-1? (Not
>> Alt-F1).
>> > Were you using SO2R and the secondary radio window? Did you ever press
>> > Alt-F1 or Alt-F2 to change bands of a previously-logged QSO? Or to
>> change
>> > bands at all? Were you using OmniRig? What radio models were selected?
>> >
>> > 73,
>> > Bob, N6TV
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Bjorn LB1GB <lb1gb at la8w.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I was puzzled by losing a multiplier in SAC, but thought I made a
>> >> mistake. After your post I investigated a bit and found RA9AP that I
>> >> worked on 10 meters shows 21009.5 when doing Alt-F. Thus losing the
>> >> mulitipier.
>> >>
>> >> wt4 file shows 10M, cabrillo shows 21009.5.
>> >>
>> >> The ADI file is correct and the QSO was confirmed as a 10M qso on LOTW.
>> >>
>> >> Bjorn LB1GB
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 4 October 2011 22:01, SM5AJV <sm5ajv at qrq.se> wrote:
>> >> > Hi!
>> >> >
>> >> > I am checking my log from SAC CW and I found one serious fault.
>> >> >
>> >> > The log line in WinTest (screen) says:
>> >> > QSO Bd Time Callsign
>> >> > 275 20 14:35 SV1ENG
>> >> >
>> >> > But I if push Alt-F to check the details it says that we
>> >> > worked on 28 MHz! The resulting Cabrillo shows 28 MHz and
>> >> > not the correct 20 meters frequency.
>> >> >
>> >> > How on earth is it possible to have one band on the log and
>> >> > another in the actual log? The fault will result i WRONG BAND
>> >> > during the logcheck and zero points/mult :-(
>> >> >
>> >> > Used WT version 4.8.0
>> >> >
>> >> > 73
>> >> > Ingo SM5AJV / SE5E
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Support mailing list
>> >> > support at win-test.com
>> >> > http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Support mailing list
>> >> support at win-test.com
>> >> http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Support mailing list
>> > support at win-test.com
>> > http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Support mailing list
>> support at win-test.com
>> http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> support at win-test.com
> http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>
More information about the Support
mailing list