[WT-support] Fwd: Microham u2R behavior with Win-Test

[Filipe Lopes]

Hi everyone,

can anyone at Win-Test say something regarding this issue?

Thank you.
Filipe Lopes CT1ILT aka CR6K



Thanks anayway Joe.

Maybe Win-Test team can help us out??

73's Filipe CT1ILT



2011/11/25 microHAM America - W4TV <support at microham.com>

>
> I have no idea but the data is being sent from Win-Test to Winkey.
> micro2R does no processing of the data on the WinKey channel.
>
>
> 73,
>
>   ... Joe Subich, W4TV
>       microHAM America, LLC.
>       http://www.microHAM-USA.com
>       http://groups.yahoo.com/group/**microHAM<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM>
>
>       support at microham.com
>
> This message, including any attachments, may contain proprietary,
> confidential or privileged information for the sole use of the specific
> individual(s) to whom it is addressed.  You are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this message is prohibited.
>  If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the
> sender by reply e-mail and delete it.
>
>
>
> On 11/25/2011 9:10 AM, Filipe Lopes wrote:
>
>> Thanks for reply Joe, I don't really know how to fix this, the only thing
>> I
>> know is that with an LPT interface with transistor and resistor
>> I don't have such delay and with the u2R the delay is there. Could it be
>> something with the Winkey?
>>
>> Filipe Lopes
>> CT1ILT aka CR6K
>>
>>
>> 2011/11/25 microHAM America - W4TV<support at microham.com>
>>
>>
>>>  I know I have asked this before but the delay that is created either
>>>
>>>> by the u2R or Win-test keeps persisting.
>>>>
>>>> The delay occurs when INSERT ($LOGGEDCALL$F2) key is pushed ? (The
>>>> delay happens between LOGGEDCALL and the "599").
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This is most certainly a Win-Test issue.  micro2R plays no role in
>>> processing $LOGGEDCALL$F2
>>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>>   ... Joe Subich, W4TV
>>>       microHAM America, LLC.
>>>       http://www.microHAM-USA.com
>>>       http://groups.yahoo.com/group/****microHAM<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/**microHAM>
>>> <http://groups.**yahoo.com/group/microHAM<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>       support at microham.com
>>>
>>> This message, including any attachments, may contain proprietary,
>>> confidential or privileged information for the sole use of the specific
>>> individual(s) to whom it is addressed.  You are hereby notified that any
>>> disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this message is prohibited.
>>>  If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
>>> the
>>> sender by reply e-mail and delete it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/25/2011 7:18 AM, Filipe Lopes wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I know I have asked this before but the delay that is created either by
>>>> the
>>>> u2R or Win-test keeps persisting.
>>>>
>>>> The delay occurs when INSERT ($LOGGEDCALL$F2)  key is pushed ? (The
>>>> delay
>>>> happens between LOGGEDCALL and the "599").
>>>>
>>>> I remark that I don't have any additional space nor a ^ that could be
>>>> causing this delay between the Call and the $F2.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> José CT1BOH measured this delay (@40WPM) and the spacing between
>>>> $LOGGEDCALL and $F2 is 300mS when it should be around 90mS!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any help would be great.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>


-- 
Regards/Cumprimentos,

Filipe Lopes CT1ILT aka CR6K
http://www.rep.pt/ct1ilt





-- 
Regards/Cumprimentos,
Filipe Lopes CT1ILT aka CR6K
http://www.rep.pt/ct1ilt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.f5mzn.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20111129/0757b4c7/attachment.html>