[WT-support] Edit QSO Alt-F

[Bjorn LB1GB]

Hello again,

It doesn't reset to a 00 frequency.

Bjorn LB1GB/LN8W

On 2 December 2011 20:55, Bob Wilson, N6TV <n6tv at arrl.net> wrote:
> Maybe I'm not understanding something, but you should be able to move the
> cursor to any QSO in your log, and press Alt-F1 or Alt-F2 to change the
> logged band.  At that point the logged frequency will then be reset to 1800,
> 3500, etc.  Then you should be able to use Alt-F to put in the exact
> frequency, if you want to, but it is not necessary to have totally accurate
> frequencies reported on every QSO in the log, as long as the MHz part is
> correct.
>
> 73,
> Bob, N6TV
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Bjorn LB1GB <lb1gb at la8w.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As some of you know we have problem that the 2nd radio logs the wrong
>> frequency after a band change. It's not consistent except it happens
>> after 2-3 band changes and only for the first QSO on the new band.
>> It's doesn't matter if I changed band 1 or 10 minutes ago. It will log
>> the frequency where the other rig was on, not the last QSO. This time
>> I made two changes. Upgrade to 4.9.1 and running through Omnirig.
>> Always changed band with Alt-F1/F2. Sometimes I had to press Alt-F1/F2
>> multiple time to make it go to next band.
>>
>> Now to what I was going to say ;-)
>>
>> Alt-F: Edit QSO. I know what the docs says about editing frequency vs
>> band. So we are stuck with useless/faulty.wt4 files, since band is
>> logged correctly while frequency is wrong. You can't edit a eg. 1802
>> entry which says band 80 to a 3502 frequency band 80. This is really
>> annoying when something like this happens. We have to edit the
>> cabrillo files before sending them to contest organizer. I believe
>> many like us like to keep the wt4 files for future reference, playing
>> off sound etc... If we again want to generate a cabrillo for some
>> reason, again we have to find the faulty contacts and edit the
>> cabrillo. Any possibility to open up the edit function to do what a
>> edit function is supposed to do, and not policing what people want to
>> edit?
>>
>> 73 Bjorn LB1GB/LN8W
>> _______________________________________________
>> Support mailing list
>> support at win-test.com
>> http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>
>