[WT-support] Win-Test at WRTC....

[Robert Bajuk]

:-)

I can blame Writelog for about 50 "virtual" dupes during network crash
and automatic merging after recovery. Those QSOs were marked as dupe
in log but not really -  80% of those QSOs (which were actualy dupes -
repeated block of last 10 - 15 QSO during merging) were not really
counted as dupes - WL scored them with points. That was the reason
that our claimed score was a bit over-claimed and that our QSO
deductions number (UBN) looks terrible at the first look.

Our WL network crashed at least 20 times during the contest, reason
unknown... illegal operation, windows, bla bla :-) It looks that
Win-test would be a better choice :-)

73 Robert, S57AW (R39D)

2010/7/15, Bob Wilson, N6TV <n6tv at arrl.net>:
> See http://www.wrtc2010.ru/result_table.php
>
> 8 of the Top 10 teams used Win-Test, including the Gold, Silver, and Bronze
> medalists.
>
> 8 of the Bottom 10 teams also used Win-Test, but I don't think they blamed
> the software. :-)
>
> 73,
> Bob, N6TV
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Nigel G3TXF <nigel at g3txf.com> wrote:
>
>> Win-Test fans will not be surprised at the high placing of
>> WT amongst the WRTC competitors.
>>
>> This interesting analysis of both the equipment and the
>> logging software used at WRTC-2010 has been provided by
>> Roger G3SXW.....
>>
>> QUOTE
>>
>> There were 48 Teams each with two transceivers:
>> Elecraft K3 - 49
>> IC756PROIII - 17
>> FT1000MP - 16
>> Two each: TS850S, IC756, IC7800, FT2000
>> One each: FTDX9000D, Ten-Tec Orion, IC775DSP, Orion 565AT,
>> Elecraft K2
>> The winning five teams all used FT1000MP or Elecraft K3.
>>
>> Logging Software:
>> Win-Test - 30
>> N1MM - 8
>> WriteLog - 5
>> TR4W - 5
>> The ten leading teams all used Win-Test or WriteLog.
>>
>> UNQUOTE
>>
>> 73 - Nigel G3TXF
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Support mailing list
>> Support at win-test.com
>> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>>
>