[WT-support] Win-Test does not meet my need!

[Jacques Saget]

115 K QSOs from K5D added to 13 k at D4C +  55 k+ from TX5C is nothing 
compared to 160k
by VP6DX !     I don't even mention other minor expeditions at hardly 
60k Qs or some marginal M/M contest
operations.
I'm afraid a still undiscovered bug multiplies the number of QSOs 
displayed by WT !

Come on guys !

Just in case, after this line I switch the "Humor mode" back to OFF.

73

Jacques, F6BEE




Girts Budis a écrit :
>
> I also can say WOW!!!!
>
>  
>
> Who will define minimal amateur radio needs.(Art W2NRA???).......13000 
> Qso's in M2 at D4C is much more tham minimum requirement!!!!
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Regards & 73
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Girts YL2KL
>
> YL2KL at D4C.CC <mailto:YL2KL at D4C.CC>
>
> WWW.D4C.CC <http://www.d4c.cc/>
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* support-bounces at win-test.com 
> [mailto:support-bounces at win-test.com] *On Behalf Of *Felipe J Hernandez
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2009 3:48 PM
> *To:* support at win-test.com
> *Subject:* Re: [WT-support] Win-Test does not meet my need!
>
>  
>
> //Wow, thats a strong statement..//
>
>  
>
> //I have to say that our experience at the k5D operation at desecheo, 
> running Win-test was a fenomenal one..//
>
> //with over 115k qsos and over 8k qsos on rtty we were glad to use 
> such a stable and functional software.//
>
>  
>
> //Ive used it for the last CQWW for at least 13k contest qsos as well 
> as RTTY and found it to be great..//
>
> //Im not saying you dont have the right to demand your purchased 
> product to be as advertised..just //
>
> //that I think that the "minimal contest software needs" is a little 
> unfair and certainly not the experience of many //
>
> //very active contesters and Dxpeditioners.//
>
>  
>
> //Regards,//
>
>  
>
> //Felipe//
>
> //NP4Z//
>
> //Op at K5D Desecheo 2009!// 
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>
>     *From:* Art Searle W2NRA <mailto:w2nra at optonline.net>
>
>     *To:* support at win-test.com <mailto:support at win-test.com>
>
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2009 9:22 AM
>
>     *Subject:* [WT-support] Win-Test does not meet my need!
>
>      
>
>     Hi Larry,
>
>     Win-Test does not meet my minimal amateur radio contest software
>     needs in
>     its current version.  This program does not perform as advertised
>     in the
>     features section of the Win-Test website.  Developers of this
>     software
>     appear to not have any plans to correct the current problems in
>     the near
>     future.  Two specific examples of Win-Test not living up to its
>     advertised
>     features are RTTY performance and Cabrillo performance.  Since it
>     doesn't
>     meet my minimal needs and advertised features I WANT A REFUND OF
>     MY 45
>     EUROs.  Please send me a refund through PayPal as soon as possible.
>
>     Quotes from you:
>
>     RTTY - As a convenience, not a feature:  I rather say it would be
>     VERY LOW
>     on our priorities of dvpt. You must know that RTTY has been added on
>     Win-Test more for convenience of users who were using it for CW
>     and Phone
>     contesting. We added the majors RTTY contests (CQWW, WPX, WAE) and
>     some
>     others, but we never claimed Win-Test to be the best RTTY logger
>     ever.
>     Despite many users won their categories in these contests with it
>     ;-) They
>     accepted the unacceptable, you see...
>
>     Cabrillo - on having to manually edit file:  I always thought (and
>     Olivier
>     too, as he wrote this part of the code), that this Cabrillo line
>     had to be
>     filled with the State (or DX). I see it can be different for some
>     ARRL
>     sections. So, yes, for now, you have to fill it manually (read :
>     edit the
>     Cabrillo file).
>
>     73 Art W2NRA
>     "Keep to the Code!"
>     w2nra.com
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.f5mzn.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090303/e3e9e33c/attachment.htm