[WT-support] VP6DX - contesting during an expedition

Carsten Esch carsten.esch at appello.de
Mon Nov 12 15:32:39 CET 2007


> Hi there,
> 
> at VP6DX in February (www.vp6dx.com) we will use Win-Test for logging.
There
> will be two sites (West and East) connected through a WiFi link.
> 
> Both sites will have antennas for most of the bands available.
> We might consider taking part in the ARRL CW contest with SOME stations.
> 
> What is the best way to do this?
> 
> - disconnect the 'non-contest' stations from the network and make a new
log
> with the 'contest stations'? After contest is over put the 'non-contest'
> stations back to the network and let the logs synchronise?
> 
> - ?
> 
> Thanks for any input!
> 
> In behalf of the VP6DX team
> 
> Carsten, DL6LAU
> 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: cjanssen at bndlg.de [mailto:cjanssen at bndlg.de] 
Gesendet: Montag, 12. November 2007 15:17
An: support at win-test.com; carsten.esch at appello.de
Cc: support at win-test.com
Betreff: Re: [WT-support] VP6DX - contesting during an expedition

Hi,

it depends on the fact if you want to take part in the contest seriously
(with tracking of
QSOs/Multis/Score). At VK9DNX we had the same situation. We also took part
in the ARRL CW (and also
in the CQ 160 SSB with 12 QSOs). We didn't change anything in the network.
We logged all contest
QSOs in DXpedition mode. For sending the rst you can modify the F2 memory.
For receiving you can
enter the state in the comment field behind the RST. So we had no idea how
many QSOs/Multis/Points
we had. We extracted the QSOs with NA out of the DXpedition log and sent it
in. We one the Oceania
M/M category...

Don't mix two different "contests" in Win-Test after the ARRL. Either you
log ALL QSOs in one file
or use two different and keep them separate until you are at home.

73s Chris


> _______________________________________________


... fine - thanks for the suggestions so far ... Your idea 

Maybe I was not 100% clear ... We sure will not mix the logs, I wonder if it
is possible to have 'two different logs' 'running in the network' at the
same time (I guess this is possible but what would be the easiest way to do
this?)

Carsten



More information about the Support mailing list