[WT-support] Bugs and Wishes for Win-Test 3.6.2
IZ4EFN Alessio
iz4efn at libero.it
Mon Nov 27 19:03:53 CET 2006
Sorry guys my fault.
I was forwarding the mail to Andy IK4VET to avoid dupe comments since he
is preparing some bugs report but is not subscribed.
I was also saying that the Tim's comment is still missing after the
contest, since we observed his comments and operating tips very closely .
Anyway Andy he told me that WT worked just fine at IO4T this weekend,
besides the logging issue already solved.
I would also like to add that the new DX Telnet worked fine around the
ALT-F3 issue with the same setup we had for cqwwssb.
Thank you guys, great job!
Alessio IZ4EFN.
> Questa è la mail più completa riguardo ai bug notati e commentati
> dagli autori
>
> manca ancora il commento di k3lr che scriverà un poema as usal :)
>> Hi Werner
>>
>> Werner Maier a écrit :
>>
>>> BUG:
>>> 1. Log a QSO.
>>> 2. AFTER Logging press ALT-F3 to spot this QSO
>>> 3. The QSO (the line already in the log, not the normal log
>>> edit line) will be cleared.
>>> 4. if you enter the callsign again there, it will be marked
>>> as a dupe.
>>> 5. if you enter another callsign there, you will end up having
>>> 1 additional QSO in the Score Summary than in the log.
>>> 6. type RELOAD, everything (scoring) is back to normal.
>>> 7. if you type reload instead of fixing the "empty" qso line
>>> the call is back.
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Already fixed in our dvpt trunk by Olivier during the CQWW CW @ TM2Y
>> ;-) One hand on the VFO, the other one on the compiler's keyboard ;-)
>>
>> PLEASE DO NOT REPORT THIS BUG ANYMORE ! TNX !
>>
>>> BUG:
>>> 1. Click on any spot in the Radio window (bandmap).
>>> 2. Check partial window and N+1 Window will NOT be
>>> updated.
>>> 3. press Space.
>>> 4. Check partial window and N+1 Window will NOT be
>>> updated.
>>> 5. Change the Call in the Call-filed.
>>> 6. SCP/N+1 Windows will get an update.
>>
>> I also noticed this while operating. We'll check it.
>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Feature Request:
>>> The bandwith of the 7 MHz CW area in the default Bandmap is
>>> too small - at least for CQWW-CW. I wondered, why I did not
>>> get eny spots above 7040 into the bandmap.
>>> After changing the bandmap and restarting WT it worked.
>>> maybe the CW area for 7 MC should be 7000-7100, at
>>> least in CQWW-CW :) maybe same idea for CQWW-SSB?
>>> maybe we should point this clearly out @ docs.win-test.com.
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Actually, we wanted a more flexible waqy to do it, and we implemented
>> the bandplans. You can set up to 9 different bandplans, and "attach"
>> one of them to your log, depending on the mode, the contest type etc...
>>
>>> Feature Request:
>>> In the Contest I clicked on a spot in the bandmap.
>>> i did not hear the spot. I turned the VFO, and found
>>> another Call somewhere. I tried to work it.
>>> But the Amp said: "ARC fault". Thank god it's been
>>> an ACOM-1000 with a lot of failure checks.
>>>
>>> After investigating I found that the TS-850 has been
>>> set to split, RX on 40m (where I had been before) and
>>> TX on 80m.
>>>
>>> it has been this spot:
>>>
>>> 7052.0 ZL3WW 26-Nov-2006 1614Z QSX 3514.10
>>> <RW4AA>
>>>
>>> I think it should not be possible to set the TRX
>>> on Cross-Band split by clicking on a spot.
>>> This could save the life some Amps :)
>>
>> Noted. I just wonder what to do with this type of spot ? ;-) Assume
>> no split ?
>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Fature Request (very low prio, but maybe a nice to have for rookies):
>>>
>>> The Log windows shows "0" points while logging a QSO.
>>> After pressing return it shows the QSO points for that QSO.
>>> Could you implement showing the QSO points into the QSO line,
>>> e.g. as (3), so that one could see how many points this qso
>>> would count?
>>
>> I guess you mean "the points you will get if you work (= enter) him",
>> right ? Noted.
>>
>> 73 and tnx for your report
>>
>> Larry - F6FVY
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Support mailing list
>> Support at win-test.com
>> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at win-test.com
> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>
More information about the Support
mailing list