[WT-support] WT and MK2R+

[Clive Whelan]

Hi Olivier

Thanks


Yes, as you say it is vital to test in the heat of battle,
as that's when the problems become apparent. However it is a
catch 22 scenario, as I could not envisage using a contest
logger without the so called ESM facility. When that becomes
available, I'll do as you suggest.


I will watch this reflector for news.

Encore merci


73


Clive
GW3NJW

-----Original Message-----
From: support-bounces at win-test.com
[mailto:support-bounces at win-test.com]On Behalf Of Olivier
F5MZN
Sent: 17 December 2006 22:10
To: support at win-test.com
Subject: Re: [WT-support] WT and MK2R+


Hi Clive,

> I'd like to know if the communication from WT to the
Winkey
> in MK2R+ works properly?
>
> You might be aware that there is a serious problem in
N1MM,
> but it is not absolutely clear if that is due to N1MM code
> or the MK2R+ itself. This problem is often manifest with (
> random) QRQ or QRS of the message, or corruption, or
> sometimes a complete crash of the Winkey. This is now a
> serious problem for me, and if WT avoids the problem then
I
> guess I need to switch.

I must confess that I didn't use my MK2R in a battle yet,
but I have
tested it al lot for implementing SO2R support and I never
see any
problem like that with.

Anyway, I suggest to download the trial version and try by
yourself.
This is always better than trusting the developers! :)

BTW, the next version of WT will come with full support of
the SO2R
capabilities of the MK2R. It will not use the LPT or DTR/RTS
pins of the
COM ports anymore but the MK2R protocol itself.

73,
--
Olivier / f5mzn
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
Support at win-test.com
http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support