[WT-support] Feature proposal

[Manfred Wolf]

I take F3 for the short TU, the blank serial number which is there,is not
needed in my opinion.

73 de Manfred, DJ5MW

----- Original Message -----
From: <marko.holmavuo at dnainternet.net>
To: <support at win-test.com>
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:22 PM
Subject: [WT-support] Feature proposal


> Yes,
>
> I agree that operator should decide when to send short or long TU, and
current
> situation stopping cw with ESC is not bad option (better than nothing).
But in
> long run, during 48 SO operation you have to minimize your actions to
maximize
> your scoring e.g. means that you shouldn't use your capacity about esc
press
> timing. You have to minimize keypresses, switch presses, mast turnings and
so
> on. As much reliable automatic as possible.
>
> For example in TR, you can have two keys, one for short and one for long
TU.
> You can use your brains to think things that will improve your score
instead of
> thinking about when to stop the cw-message.
>
> TR solution is good one, IMHO.
>
> Ok, this is more contest theory now.
>
> Automatic long/short TU triggering was just an idea, propably not so
usefull.
> it was just one idea to feature rich implementation basket.
>
> 73 Marko OH4JFN
>
> www.oh2u.com
>
> >Hi:
> >I fully second Simon's point of view. Hitting ESC at the right
> >moment is exactly what I have been practizing in these situations
> >ever since I started using computer-generated CW messages. Don't
> >put too much intelligence into the software - let the operator
> >decide when it's time to finish a QSO with "TU" and when not.
> >73 Ben
> >--
> >DL6RAI
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at win-test.com
> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>