[wt4hq] Win-Test for HQ package 2010

Dieter Kritzer oe8kdk at oevsv.at
Tue Jul 6 12:14:18 CEST 2010


Hello Larry and Mario,

right now i am a little bit confused about the compiling.

I want to give my server-guy exact informations how to compile and run the server.
Is it possible to write us all that commands?
Also I am interested, how we can monitor the server-program, if its still running (watch-dog). I
think there is a command to watch the server.

Also there is a command, that the program is killed and restarted again every 3 or 5 minutes.
I hope we would not need that this year, but I want to prepare it.


For your info:
OE1A did a few tests, everything works perfect right now!!!!!
Thank you to Larry and his Team!!


73 Dieter, OE8KDK
Team leader OE1A





-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: wt4hq-bounces at win-test.com [mailto:wt4hq-bounces at win-test.com] Im Auftrag von Laurent HAAS -
F6FVY
Gesendet: Montag, 05. Juli 2010 22:58
An: wt4hq at win-test.com
Betreff: Re: [wt4hq] Win-Test for HQ package 2010

Hi Mario

Mario Lorenz a écrit :

>> if (tun)
>>    tun = tun->pNext;
> 
> Yes, I think that would do.

Actually, I did the modification this afternoon and the new code is 
running on our test network. If all is OK in 24 ou 48h we will 
"officially" release this code, even if anyone can easily make the 
modification in its own source and recompile.

> is there a Changelog for 4.5.2 vs 4.4 ?
> In particular, what did change with the network protocol ?

4.5.2-HQ has the same features as the non-HQ 4.5.1. The .2 minor 
revision numbering is only related to the non-registration modifications.

About the network, I fixed in 4.5.0 the frames leaks you found last year 
by using different frames for "NEEDQSO" in case of sync usage. Now, the 
bridgehead machines send NEEDQSOWAN frames (and are passing thru 
wtTunnel client), whereas non-bridgehead machines only send NEEDQSO 
frames (that are kept local by filtering them in the wtTunnel client). 
It thus decreases a bit the total data volume on the WAN.

> I am in a particular bind now: All our real tests have been done
> last weekend. theres some stations who wont visit their stations again until
> next saturday. So I had to decree 4.4 and Tunnel 1.10 as the version to be
> used here.

The wt-4.4.0 and wtTunnel-1.10 can be associated with no problem. The 
only difference with the current package (wt-4.5.x / wtTunnel-1.12) is 
the network protocol (see above), and various mods/bufixes you can read 
in the release file under the 4.5.x version.

73

Larry - F6FVY
_______________________________________________
Wt4hq mailing list
Wt4hq at win-test.com
http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wt4hq



More information about the Wt4hq mailing list