[wt4hq] Bridgehead-Bug / LogSync
Mario Lorenz
ml at vdazone.org
Sun Jul 12 19:25:10 CEST 2009
Hello Larry,
Am 12. Jul 2009, um 12:53:08 schrieb Laurent HAAS - F6FVY:
> Well done.
>
> I checked the WT sources, and found where (and when) it happens. I'll
> discuss this matter with Olivier but I'm confident we will find a way to
> prevent this waste of bandwith for next year !
Well, as discussed I think in the last year too, bandwith alone isnt the
concern. Its a matter of stability and feedback. Overall, from what
I know, this little "logsynching" didnt hurt, indeed it helped cover a
few minutes of outages here and there due to various reasons.
But its amplified bursty traffic (several stations requesting the same
QSO, and the request being dutifully fulfilled for all of them)...
> I hope it didn't happened and you had a good night ;-)
Well, if I had known things were as smooth as they were, I could have
driven home and slept in my comfortable bed, instead of a car seat next
to the station, ready for immediate corrective action that wasnt necessary...
So I guess it'll then be time to set sights on 4.0 :)
73s, and I hope things were equally smooth for all you other Network guys!
See you all next year!
Mario
--
Mario Lorenz Internet: <ml at vdazone.org>
Ham Radio: DL5MLO at DB0ERF.#THR.DEU.EU
Trust the computer industry to shorten "Year 2000" to Y2K. It was this kind
of thinking that caused the problem in the first place.
More information about the Wt4hq
mailing list