[wt4hq] WT tunnel test

[Zygi rf.pl]

Hi all HQ
As a rule of tumb never mixed versions, regardless results.
Is a good practice.

Try under load and observe server side (logs, telnet console, etc).

Is much better, than with earlier version, but simulation with eg. 1000 QSO's
loaded on one terminal / 2-3 terminals and running empty another terminal shown
on server side buffer overload. Under W32 version.

Unfortunetly code for Linux is compliled by Olivier is  for Debian.
I'm running red hat eterprise and may be something is wrong.
Must investigate and run another testing sessions.

In my opinion we can use WT for now with WAN version, but the problem is with such
a powefull operations as DA0HQ, TM0HQ, GB6HQ, SN0HQ where the QSO flow is rated 1000 QSO/h
or more with the final result 20k QSO or more (26 k QSO DA0HQ 2006).
I'm afraid same situation observed with DA0HQ guys in 2006.

regards

Zygi SP5ELA
SN0HQ Team

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter" <pc2a at pi4cc.nl>
To: <wt4hq at win-test.com>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 11:56 AM
Subject: [wt4hq] WT tunnel test


> Hi,
> 
> I have setup here a test server running on Debian
> I have tested here with a few members and its runs nice.
> We have no problems and all logs give the same qso's an scoring
> 
> We do run mixed version of Win-test (3.8 - 3.10) and still all ok.
> 
> I like to test the tunnel under load and share the outcome.
> 
> If you will try your welcome at
> pi4cc.nl port 10368
> user pi4ccc
> password test
> 
> Peter
> BTW running linux tunnel 2.1
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wt4hq mailing list
> Wt4hq at win-test.com
> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wt4hq