AW: [Wrtc] wt-3.0.3-wrtc

[Tõnno Vähk]

maybe someone else can test, i have my setup apart but if you don't discover anything then don't worry about it now I guess:) 

-----Original Message-----
From: wrtc-bounces at win-test.com [mailto:wrtc-bounces at win-test.com] On Behalf Of Olivier F5MZN
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:47 AM
To: Talks on WT improvements for the WRTC
Subject: Re: AW: [Wrtc] wt-3.0.3-wrtc

Tõnno Vähk wrote:
> 2x FT1000MP

Just tried with two FT1000MP simulator with the same scenarios you described (80 LSB with split ON, 20 CW with split ON) and CTRL+S well exchanged frequencies *and* modes on both radios. I tried several time with 100% success. So, it works for me!?!?

73,
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
_______________________________________________
Wrtc mailing list
Wrtc at win-test.com
http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wrtc