<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"><head>
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css"/>
</head>
<body>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt">I do some QSOs in last SARTG Test and use a laptop with 2Tone and MTTY engine only as
second decoder.</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt">In hard conditions, weak signals and hvy QSB 2T works much better. Its realy a good
decoder, and is only this, a better decoder that enhace MTTYdecodification, you need have
installed MTTY engine.and use it to transmit.</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt">You can test 2Tone and with the notch killing one tone of a RTTY signal, and it decodes
perfect.</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt">Jorge LV5V / LU5V V </span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br />
</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br />
</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br />
</span></font></div>
<div align="left">
<hr size="1pt" width="100%" align="left"/>
</div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt">On 22 Aug 2013 at 14:45, Bob Wilson, N6TV wrote:</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br />
</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt">On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Bernhard Buettner DL6RAI <</span></font><a href="mailto:wt13@dl6rai.muc.de"><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt"><u>wt13@dl6rai.muc.de</u></span></font></a><font face="Arial" size="2"><span
style=" font-size:10pt">>
wrote:</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:9mm; margin-right:0mm; text-indent:0mm; margin-top:0.00mm; margin-bottom:0.00mm;"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt">> Most people don't use Win-Test on RTTY except for casual contesting, in<br />
> which case MMTTY and FSK works fine.<br />
<br />
</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:9mm; margin-right:0mm; text-indent:0mm; margin-top:4.75mm; margin-bottom:4.75mm;"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt">How do you come to that conclusion? I know lots of people who use<br />
the WT+MMTTY combo for *serious* RTTY contesting.</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm; margin-right:0mm; text-indent:0mm; margin-top:4.75mm; margin-bottom:4.75mm;"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br />
</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm; margin-right:0mm; text-indent:0mm; margin-top:4.75mm; margin-bottom:4.75mm;"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br />
It is true that the CQ WPX RTTY SOHP world record is held by someone using Win-Test
(UA5C operating EF8M).</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm; margin-right:0mm; text-indent:0mm; margin-top:4.75mm; margin-bottom:4.75mm;"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br />
</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm; margin-right:0mm; text-indent:0mm; margin-top:4.75mm; margin-bottom:4.75mm;"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt">I was referring to the Logger Usage Statistics for the 2012 CQ WW WPX Contest. Less
than 200 logs out of the 3550 logs received used Win-Test in that contest (5.6%). More
people used N1MM (51%), MixW (14%), and Writelog(8%). They have more development
focus on RTTY operating than Win-Test.<br />
<br />
Do you think if Win-Test worked better with 2-Tone, it would be any more popular? Is
2Tone that much better than MMTTY? I was disappointed that 2Tone was intended for
AFSK rather than FSK, and that it didn't have any PTT support.</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm; margin-right:0mm; text-indent:0mm; margin-top:4.75mm; margin-bottom:4.75mm;"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt">73,</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm; margin-right:0mm; text-indent:0mm; margin-top:4.75mm; margin-bottom:4.75mm;"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt">Bob, N6TV</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm; margin-right:0mm; text-indent:0mm; margin-top:4.75mm; margin-bottom:4.75mm;"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br />
</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm; margin-right:0mm; text-indent:0mm; margin-top:4.75mm; margin-bottom:4.75mm;"> </div>
</body>
</html>