<div dir="ltr">What do you mean by "You need have installed MTTY engine.and use it to transmit."?<div><br></div><div>Did you use use MMTTY with Win-Test at the same time that you had 2Tone running?</div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br clear="all"><div>73,<div>Bob, N6TV</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:02 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jegk@bariloche.com.ar" target="_blank">jegk@bariloche.com.ar</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">I do some QSOs in last SARTG Test and use a laptop with 2Tone and MTTY engine only as
second decoder.</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">In hard conditions, weak signals and hvy QSB 2T works much better. Its realy a good
decoder, and is only this, a better decoder that enhace MTTYdecodification, you need have
installed MTTY engine.and use it to transmit.</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">You can test 2Tone and with the notch killing one tone of a RTTY signal, and it decodes
perfect.</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">Jorge LV5V / LU5V V </span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt"><br>
</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt"><br>
</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt"><br>
</span></font></div>
<div align="left">
<hr size="1pt" width="100%" align="left">
</div><div><div class="h5">
<div align="left"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">On 22 Aug 2013 at 14:45, Bob Wilson, N6TV wrote:</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt"><br>
</span></font></div>
<div align="left"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Bernhard Buettner DL6RAI <</span></font><a href="mailto:wt13@dl6rai.muc.de" target="_blank"><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff"><span style="font-size:10pt"><u>wt13@dl6rai.muc.de</u></span></font></a><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">>
wrote:</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:9mm;margin-right:0mm;text-indent:0mm;margin-top:0.00mm;margin-bottom:0.00mm"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">> Most people don't use Win-Test on RTTY except for casual contesting, in<br>
> which case MMTTY and FSK works fine.<br>
<br>
</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:9mm;margin-right:0mm;text-indent:0mm;margin-top:4.75mm;margin-bottom:4.75mm"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">How do you come to that conclusion? I know lots of people who use<br>
the WT+MMTTY combo for *serious* RTTY contesting.</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm;margin-right:0mm;text-indent:0mm;margin-top:4.75mm;margin-bottom:4.75mm"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt"><br>
</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm;margin-right:0mm;text-indent:0mm;margin-top:4.75mm;margin-bottom:4.75mm"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt"><br>
It is true that the CQ WPX RTTY SOHP world record is held by someone using Win-Test
(UA5C operating EF8M).</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm;margin-right:0mm;text-indent:0mm;margin-top:4.75mm;margin-bottom:4.75mm"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt"><br>
</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm;margin-right:0mm;text-indent:0mm;margin-top:4.75mm;margin-bottom:4.75mm"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">I was referring to the Logger Usage Statistics for the 2012 CQ WW WPX Contest. Less
than 200 logs out of the 3550 logs received used Win-Test in that contest (5.6%). More
people used N1MM (51%), MixW (14%), and Writelog(8%). They have more development
focus on RTTY operating than Win-Test.<br>
<br>
Do you think if Win-Test worked better with 2-Tone, it would be any more popular? Is
2Tone that much better than MMTTY? I was disappointed that 2Tone was intended for
AFSK rather than FSK, and that it didn't have any PTT support.</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm;margin-right:0mm;text-indent:0mm;margin-top:4.75mm;margin-bottom:4.75mm"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">73,</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm;margin-right:0mm;text-indent:0mm;margin-top:4.75mm;margin-bottom:4.75mm"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt">Bob, N6TV</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm;margin-right:0mm;text-indent:0mm;margin-top:4.75mm;margin-bottom:4.75mm"><font face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10pt"><br>
</span></font></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-left:0mm;margin-right:0mm;text-indent:0mm;margin-top:4.75mm;margin-bottom:4.75mm"> </div>
</div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Support mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:support@win-test.com">support@win-test.com</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support" target="_blank">http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>