<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:lucida console, sans-serif;font-size:10pt">Hmmm. <br><br>Can't it be something so simple as a L2 switching loop in your IP network Tonno ? <br><br>73, <br><br>zoli ha1ag<br><div><span><br></span></div><div><br></div> <div style="font-family: lucida console, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gmail.com><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> support@win-test.com <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Saturday, November 3, 2012 10:56 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [WT-support] Network problem, explosion of duplicates<br> </font> </div> <br><div id="yiv1086778144"><style><!--
#yiv1086778144
_filtered #yiv1086778144 {font-family:"Cambria Math";panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
_filtered #yiv1086778144 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
_filtered #yiv1086778144 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
#yiv1086778144
#yiv1086778144 p.yiv1086778144MsoNormal, #yiv1086778144 li.yiv1086778144MsoNormal, #yiv1086778144 div.yiv1086778144MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", "serif";}
#yiv1086778144 a:link, #yiv1086778144 span.yiv1086778144MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv1086778144 a:visited, #yiv1086778144 span.yiv1086778144MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv1086778144 span.yiv1086778144EmailStyle17
{font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;}
#yiv1086778144 .yiv1086778144MsoChpDefault
{}
_filtered #yiv1086778144 {margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
#yiv1086778144 div.yiv1086778144WordSection1
{}
--></style><div><div class="yiv1086778144WordSection1"><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;">This is a good question. I have started to think myself that this might be maybe a way to find the conflict.</span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;"> </span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;">The stations were configured as such:</span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;"> </span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;">STN1 –
RUN</span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;">STN2 – RUN+</span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;">STN3 – RUN+</span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;">STN4 – RUN+</span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;">STN5 – MULT</span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;"> </span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",
"sans-serif";color:#1F497D;">So STN1 was running and STN2 was helping him to listen to RUN frequency with another RX antenna and could also log QSOs. And interlocked STN3 and STN4 were doing S&P on the run band.</span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;"> </span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;">It is of course possible to have several support stations, the program enables that.</span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;"> </span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;">Additionally STN2 had SO2R configured so
that it was able to switch Active Radio and work multipliers on other bands. The 2nd Radio for STN2 was configured as MULT+.</span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;"> </span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;">It seems that the problems of the network were originated from this STN2. The error messages and the mupliplication of the last QSO happened in this computer. Maybe the operator forgot to change the active radio and logged a multiplier on another band while being RUN+... But can something like that cause such network issue...</span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;"> </span></div><div
class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;">What if two RUN+ stations logged a QSO with different station at exactly the same moment...</span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;"> </span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;">Windows XP and antivirus this Microsoft Security Essentials..</span></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:#1F497D;"> </span></div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm;"><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",
"sans-serif";" lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma", "sans-serif";" lang="EN-US"> support-bounces@f5mzn.org [mailto:support-bounces@f5mzn.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Patrick 9A5CW<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, November 02, 2012 10:18 PM<br><b>To:</b> support@win-test.com<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [WT-support] Network problem, explosion of duplicates</span></div></div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal"> </div><div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal">Hi,</div></div><div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal">questions:</div></div><div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal">how many RUNNER - RUN + RUN support + PARTNER where on the network?</div></div><div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal">How many MULT stations where on Network?</div></div><div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal">Station identifiers each differnet in WT? example RUN1 (1st OP), RUN2 (2nd op PARTNER), RUNDINBAND, MULT1, MULT2 ?
(cud be secret!;) ) Maybe some of those make conflicts on Network.</div></div><div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal">What windows do you use?</div></div><div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal">What anivirus on each PC? if any...</div></div><div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal">Something duplicates the WT UDP data protocol on the network!</div></div><div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal">@ 9A1P with WT 4.8.0 i think nothing similar ever happen, using there RUN1, RUN2 (2nd op Partner) + MULT (total 3 PCs/mix of XP and win7 + standard network switch).</div></div><div><div class="yiv1086778144MsoNormal">Best 73, Patrik 9A5CW</div></div></div></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>Support mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:support@win-test.com" href="mailto:support@win-test.com">support@win-test.com</a><br><a href="http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support"
target="_blank">http://lists.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support</a><br><br><br> </div> </div> </div></body></html>