[WT-support] Win-Test and contest numbers

Ken Chandler g0orh at sky.com
Tue May 29 10:30:50 CEST 2012


I've only just hooked up to this thread, so excuse me if its been talked
about before now, For contest such as IOTA, I believe (tin hat on) that the
RSGB has said that the sending of serial numbers of the same number is not a
problem as long as its shown in the in both TX & RX logs!!!

 

Ken..G0ORH 

 

From: support-bounces at f5mzn.org [mailto:support-bounces at f5mzn.org] On Behalf
Of Nick F5VIH/SV3SJ
Sent: 29 May 2012 09:15
To: support at win-test.com
Subject: Re: [WT-support] Win-Test and contest numbers

 

 

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Bob Wilson, N6TV <n6tv at arrl.net> wrote:

 

 

You mean numbering per computer, rather than per band?


Yes, numbering per station. This will ensure to have increasing serial
numbers per station. The duplicate numbers that there will occur, are not
causing a problem.

 

Getting back to Win-Test, the serial no. situation is not just a problem at
big multi-multi's; the SO2R operator attempting to interleave two QSOs can
also get into the situation where the serial no. sent on both Radio 1 and
Radio 2 is the same, but the second QSO entered will get logged as if QSO
number + 1 was sent (when it was not).

 


This race condition can be avoided if one adopts the following trade-off.
First log the call and then send the exchange (with the insert key).

This will not ensure sending numbers in sequence but it will solve the more
important issue of sending one exchange and logging a different one. There
are shortcomings to this, like not being able to use ESM and that both
stations sharing a numbering series have to do the same thing.

73, Nick

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.f5mzn.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20120529/bd357537/attachment.html>


More information about the Support mailing list