[WT-support] Re: WPX M/S rule clarification request

[Laurent HAAS - F6FVY]

Hi Peter

Peter Bowyer a écrit :

> On 11/03/07, Olivier F5MZN <olecam at f5mzn.org> wrote:
> 
>> Laurent HAAS - F6FVY wrote:
>>
>> > I'm pretty surprised by this "new" notion of xmtr number in _M/S_
>> > category, I never heard of, for any contest !
>> >
>> > TBH, I really wonder if Steve didn't made a mistake and wasn't rather
>> > talking abt the _M/2_ category in which the xmtr number is much more
>> > usual (and supported in WT).
>> >
>> > Before going any further, could you please make me a favour and ask for
>> > a confirmation, please ?
>>
>> Anyway, it does not make lot of sense IMHO to show a "xmtrs number"
>> which won't follow the serial number : the same xmtr can operate several
>> bands and for this reason there won't be no sync between the serial and
>> the xmtr #.
> 
> 
> It makes sense from the adjudicators point of view if he wants to
> enforce the 10-minute rule.

In that case, and if it related to the 10 minutes rules only, it must be 
clearly stated in the rules whichever QSO numbering "method" is used. 
AFAIK, the 2007 rules are already published and it is not stated.

Let's wait Steve's answer...

73

Larry - F6FVY