[WT-support] WT and micro KEYER ?
Joerg Tack
df7th at gmx.net
Wed Jan 10 16:03:15 CET 2007
Hi Pablo, Patrick,
yes when reading this I think we simply had the wrong version with us (3.45). That's life ! Also the other point I mentioned in my experience summary could be solved by increasing the time period for CQ-repeat as Ben wrote me.
Thanks for your information !
Regards,
Joe -DF7TH-
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:33:28 +0100
Von: "Pablo - EA4TX" <jpgarcia at interlanco.com>
An: support at win-test.com
Betreff: RE: [WT-support] WT and micro KEYER ?
> Patrick and Joe,
>
> Micro Keyer (by microHAM) works flawlessly with WT.
>
> It's true that a previous version had this bug ($CORRECT variable), but it
> was fixed on 3.6.0 dated 20/Nov/06. As XF4DL activation was on previous
> date
> (17/Oct/06--3/Nov/06) I suppose Joe detected this bug using winkey feature
> with the Micro Keyer. If the winkey was not used, this bug was not
> detected!
>
> I have done several contests using WT and microHAM Keyer, and my opinion
> is
> "Simply Superb!"
>
> If your idea is to operate SO2R in a future.... maybe a MK2R is the
> correct
> way .... but I cannot add some comments on this new equipment.
>
> Regards, Pablo - EA4TX
>
>
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: support-bounces at win-test.com [mailto:support-bounces at win-test.com]En
> nombre de Joerg Tack
> Enviado el: lunes, 08 de enero de 2007 16:10
> Para: support at win-test.com
> Asunto: Re: [WT-support] WT and micro KEYER ?
>
>
> Hello Patrick,
>
> we partially did use some CW-Keyers at the XF4DL activation - no
> micro-keyer but.
>
> The experience with the CW-Keyer was that WT behaved
> differently with some functions when using the WinKeyer
> contained in the MicroHAM CW-Keyer.
>
> Some CW-messages have been different and I wanted to put this
> up in the reflector within an DXpedition experience "topic".
>
> I don't have my notes at hand but one thing I remember:
>
> The "intelligent QSL" feature (== repeating the partner call
> in the response msg when it has been modified) did not work.
> With Winkey enabled using the MicroHAM CW-Keyer the partner
> call was always repeated within the QSL message.
>
> I hope this can be fixed within WT and is not a general problem with
> WinKey.
> I don't remember other related issues right now but would need to consult
> my related notes to be sure.
>
>
> 73, Joe
> -DF7TH-
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 15:01:54 +0100
> Von: "Patrick Egloff" <pegloff at gmail.com>
> An: support at win-test.com
> Betreff: [WT-support] WT and micro KEYER ?
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to invest in a micro KEYER by microHAM.
> > Does anyone have experience with this one and WT ?
> >
> > If, one day, i want to try SO2R, does WT drive two of these interfaces
> in
> > SO2R or is it wise to buy a MK2R ( which is much more expensive.. :-(
> )
> >
> > Thanks for any advice.
> > 73 and a hny,
> > --
> > Patrick Egloff - TK5EP
> > email : pegloff at gmail.com
> > Fax : +33 826 698 954
> > Web page : http://tk5ep.free.fr
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at win-test.com
> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>
>
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
More information about the Support
mailing list