[WT-support] CI-V Interface to Icom is WinTest different than CT?

[HRS I4UFH]

V 3.20 works right with 756Pro, very smooth,  with the older ICOM's
751/765/751 from my side this problem still exist, never tester with CT ..

73 Fabio I4UFH


----- Original Message -----
From: "HRS I4UFH" <i4ufh at hamradiosolutions.com>
To: <support at win-test.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: [WT-support] CI-V Interface to Icom is WinTest different than
CT?


>
> Same problem, 756Pro EZMaster or USB<->serial adapter, WXP Pro SP1
>
> 73 de Fabio I4UFH
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "9K2HN" <9k2hn at 9k2hn.com>
> To: <support at win-test.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 8:46 AM
> Subject: RE: [WT-support] CI-V Interface to Icom is WinTest different than
> CT?
>
>
> > Hi Olivier,
> >
> >      I'm facing the same problem Tim talked about. My Radio is ICOM
> > IC-756 PRO III and microkeyer, I feel also it is a win-test problem
> > because the Frequency changes very fast in microkeyer Router program.
> >
> > de 9k2hn
> > Hamad
> >
> > P.S: No problem with my Mult station radio FT-1000 Mark-V (also with
> > microkeyer)
> >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > Subject: Re: [WT-support] CI-V Interface to Icom is WinTest different
> > > than CT?
> > > From: Olivier F5MZN <olecam at f5mzn.org>
> > > Date: Thu, August 31, 2006 9:11 am
> > > To: support at win-test.com, zephd at indy.rr.com
> > >
> > > Hi -
> > >
> > > Tim Duffy K3LR wrote:
> > > > Oliver ..... I have set the CI-V TRANSCEIVE Option to OFF and it
> doesn't
> > > > seem to make any difference.
> > > >
> > > > When the Dial is turned suddenly, it takes 1-2 Seconds for the
Bandmap
> > > > Frequency to change.
> > > >
> > > > The only way that the Bandmap Frequency changes at a steady,
> continuous rate
> > > > is to turn the Dial VERY VERY SLOWLY.
> > > >
> > > > It does not update at the rate we are used to in CT - there's no
doubt
> about
> > > > that.  We are used to the Bandmap Frequency changing much more
rapidly
> in
> > > > CT.
> > > >
> > > > I don't care if the implantation is the same as CT, but it's VERY
> IMPORTANT
> > > > to us that it work as well as CT.
> > > >
> > > > Right now I would classify this as a SHOW STOPPER.
> > >
> > > Anybody else noticed the same result with Icom radios?
> > >
> > > 73,
> > > --
> > > Olivier / f5mzn
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Support mailing list
> > > Support at win-test.com
> > > http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Support mailing list
> > Support at win-test.com
> > http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at win-test.com
> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>