[WT-support] Infos WT v3.0

[Milan Pelech]

> Hi Milan,
> have you ever tried to copy an extremly weak signal of a QRP-station?

Yes Chris, many times. I the past few years I had good chance try it in 
OL7R or as OLxHQ station ...

> If your answer is YES than you will agree with me that it is easier
> to copy a short call.

Sure. I agree with you. But it depends mainly on the fact, if you want to 
make some contact or if you will search some argument for valid or invalid 
callsign exchange.

> I don`t have any idea why the QRPer are doing that
> with the /QRP.

I have one good idea. Dont speculate about right or bad callsign exchange 
and make QSOs with reall callsigns as will be on the air. Not exist easier 
access how you can win the contest. Nothing is only white or black.

73 de Milan, OK1VWK


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christian Friess" <chfriess at compuserve.de>
To: <support at win-test.com>
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [WT-support] Infos WT v3.0


> Hi Milan,
> have you ever tried to copy an extremly weak signal of a QRP-station?
> If your answer is YES than you will agree with me that it is easier
> to copy a short call. I don`t have any idea why the QRPer are doing that
> with the /QRP.
>
> 73 de Chris, DL2MDU
>
> Am Montag 07 August 2006 14:38 schrieb Milan Pelech:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Who can say what is valid and what is invalid exchange ? You ? Me ? Is 
>> it
>> invalid when I write the same call which I listen really on the radio ? 
>> Its
>> not my error if oposite station is giving /QRP and in fact I have to 
>> record
>> into log what I listen not what I mean or what would be better for
>> cabrillo.
>>
>> If logger has problem with longer callsign record, thats no good logger, 
>> I
>> think. It isnt problem for cabrillo.
>>
>> Thats my personal idea.
>>
>> 73 de Milan, OK1VWK
>>
>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>   From: Dave Sharred
>>   To: support at win-test.com
>>   Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:55 PM
>>   Subject: RE: [WT-support] Infos WT v3.0
>>
>>
>>   Hello Herve;
>>
>>   I never log /QRP; it is not a valid exchange !!!
>>
>>   I personally would remove it.
>>
>>   In terms of logging software, I cannot think of a valid call that 
>> might
>> be longer than IS0/IZ2ABP/P; though I can remember some calls like
>> BY1QH/Own call. So 12 characters should always be enough!
>>
>>   Ultimately, the cabrillo output file format should define the max 
>> length
>> of the call field (I haven't checked this).   If any logging program has 
>> a
>> file size bigger than the allowed cabrillo format, then it will not 
>> conform
>> !
>>
>>   73
>>   Dave
>>   G3NKC/MD4K
>>     -----Original Message-----
>>     From: support-bounces at win-test.com
>> [mailto:support-bounces at win-test.com]On Behalf Of Rcc Sent: 04 August 
>> 2006
>> 13:25
>>     To: support at win-test.com
>>     Subject: [WT-support] Infos WT v3.0
>>
>>
>>     Hello with all,    I used Wintest v3.0 for the IOTA HF 2006, since 
>> the
>> radio-club Cappellois "F8KGS" and I have a small question to subject to
>> you. At the time of this contest, I contacted IS0/IZ2ABP/QRP but in the 
>> log
>> it was indicated there IS0/IZ2ABP/QR? It summer impossible to add P of 
>> QRP
>> because the field of saissy of the code be too short. During do the
>> creation of the file cabrillo, I have to add P of QRP?   Can you inform 
>> me,
>> thank you and 73 for F8KGS - Herve (F6UGW)
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>---
>>
>>
>>   _______________________________________________
>>   Support mailing list
>>   Support at win-test.com
>>   http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at win-test.com
> http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support